<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>Pittsburgh Criminal Law Blog - Pennsylvania Ignition Interlock Update - Comments</title>
      <link>http://www.pittsburghcriminallawblog.com/</link>
      <description>Gerald B. McNamara Pittsburgh Criminal Defense Attorney</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:40:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:40:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Scottsdale Divorce Lawyer </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Interlock units are required for first time offenders here in Arizona, and as far as I am concerned they are pointless and do more harm than anything. Not to mention it is a huge inconvenience for the offender, which in most cases is their first offence. There are even stories in AZ about people being cited for DUI because they were overly emotional and now they too have to have an interlock. This study sums it up pretty well, interlocks are a huge waste. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.pittsburghcriminallawblog.com/dui-collateral-consequences/pennsylvania-ignition-interlock-update/#119809</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittsburghcriminallawblog.com/dui-collateral-consequences/pennsylvania-ignition-interlock-update/#119809</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pittsburghcriminallawblog.com/">DUI Collateral Consequences</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:15:58 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Gerald B. McNamara</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
